New recycling processes or new materials?

The sustainability debate in materials science sometimes asks the wrong questions.

How do we recycle more aluminium & steel? These are legitimate — but they treat recyclability/sustainability as an afterthought, forcing materials never designed for circularity back into something useful at considerable cost and energy penalty: facts that Europe, specially, cannot anymore afford.

The presence of aluminium in aircraft fleets has experience a significant reduction over the past decades. A 787 Dreamliner uses only 20% of aluminium as skin parts as compared to 75% in a 747. Upon development, new materials research should replace existing materials with recyclability-by-design (Chart extracted from [1])

The most transformative step will not be better recycling processes for existing materials. It will be new material systems in which circularity is intrinsic — not added on.

The aerospace industry’s shift from aluminium to multi-material architectures has delivered real efficiency gains and it can be served as a best-example for future practices and trend research in metallurgy & materials science. The next shift should be just as deliberate — building sustainability in from first principles, not bolting it on afterwards.

The aerospace example will not remain an isolated case.

Across metallurgy, metalworking, and materials manufacturing — from structural steels to electronic substrates, from casting alloys to advanced coatings — the entire industrial ecosystem will face the same reckoning. Climate targets are not aspirational backdrops: they are fast becoming binding constraints that no material specification sheet can ignore.

The industries that will lead the future are those that invest now in deep, fundamental scientific research: not incremental improvements to what already exists, but the patient, science-driven pursuit of new materials that were never possible before.

That is a different kind of ambition from optimising a production line or tweaking an alloy composition. It demands a closer relationship between academia, industry, and policy — and a willingness to accept that the most important material of the next decade may not yet have a name!

References:
[1] Krzyzak, A.; Kosicka, E.; Borowiec, M.; Szczepaniak, R. Selected Tribological Properties and Vibrations in the Base Resonance Zone of the Polymer Composite Used in the Aviation Industry. Materials 202013, 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061364

Leave a comment